Skip to content
SeenRelay
Start locally
CONTROLLED PROOF ATLAS

Here is where SeenRelay has already reduced real provider work.

Every row below is bounded first-party evidence with real provider execution and a frozen semantic contract. A mechanism can pass even when a cheaper local or source-native path would solve that exact benchmark task, so each row now exposes baseline quality separately. These are not customer ROI.

MEASURED MECHANISM RESULTS

Provider work avoided under the frozen comparator.

Native/local alternatives remain first. A high reduction proves coordination only when baseline quality says so; it does not automatically prove the expensive tool was necessary.

66.30%

Multi-agent shared evidence / independent reasoning

13 → 4 paid web-search actions · 8 → 10 model Responses
$0.16499684 → $0.05560972 · avoided $0.10938712 gross

Eight department agents across two tenant identities performed useful current ecosystem research. SeenRelay shared one same-tenant evidence packet per organization while preserving all eight independent role analyses. Gross provider cost fell from $0.16499684 to $0.05560972. SeenRelay OpsCo was first-party real operating work; the second tenant was explicitly synthetic. Local coordination/integration overhead was not monetized, so this is not customer ROI, net customer savings, external adoption or a universal 66% claim.

First-party real operating workload + synthetic external-client rehearsal · baseline quality TOOL_NECESSITY_PASS_BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 1 complete paired run

Case study →
74.95%

Hosted compute / 64 GB tool session

4 → 1 provider executions
$1.9241253 → $0.4820025 · avoided $1.4421228

Mechanism-only benchmark: the exact task was deterministic SHA-256 and could be done locally. This row proves duplicate hosted-resource coalescing, not that a 64 GB container was necessary for SHA-256.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality MECHANISM_ONLY_LOCAL_WINS · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
66.88% mean

Agentic web search — explicit shared-snapshot contract

4 → 1 provider executions
4 top-level executions → 1 top-level execution · avoided 42.84%–85.73%

Mechanism-only benchmark for this exact task: all callers accepted one shared fresh provider-search snapshot, but the requested latest PyPI package version is available from PyPI directly. This proves shared-search coordination, not web-search necessity. Other agentic-search workloads may require k>1 or k=N.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality MECHANISM_ONLY_SOURCE_NATIVE_WINS · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
66.7%

Decision-time freshness

6 → 2 provider executions
6 provider reads → 2 provider reads · avoided 4 provider reads

Compared with Firecrawl provider-native maxAge on the same controlled schedule: native path stayed at 6 calls / 6 credits, while SeenRelay used 2 calls / 2 credits in 3/3 runs. Hard max-age policy remained satisfied; no claim of hidden source-change detection inside the allowed age window.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
75%

Exact web extraction

4 → 1 provider executions
4 Firecrawl credits → 1 Firecrawl credit · avoided 3 Firecrawl credits

Exact same-boundary markdown extraction. A separate structured JSON contract failed semantic equality and remains a negative result.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
75%

Weather downstream analysis

4 → 1 provider executions
4 paid analyses → 1 paid analysis · avoided 3 paid analyses

Mechanism-only benchmark: real Open-Meteo state stayed unchanged, but the paid classifier applied fixed rules that the harness itself could compute locally. This proves state-keyed recomputation control, not best-baseline weather economics.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality MECHANISM_ONLY_LOCAL_WINS · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
50%

Weather state transition

4 → 2 provider executions
4 paid analyses → 2 paid analyses · avoided 2 paid analyses

Controlled A,A,B,B transition forced a new analysis at B and recorded zero stale reuse after the change.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
75%

Retail extraction guarded by price state

4 → 1 provider executions
4 Firecrawl credits → 1 Firecrawl credit · avoided 3 Firecrawl credits

Native-first conditional: the direct Apple read already resolves the monitored price/capacity state. Paid Firecrawl extraction is relevant only when the caller needs the richer extraction artifact; if state alone is sufficient, SeenRelay should self-reject.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality NATIVE_FIRST_CONDITIONAL · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
50%

Retail price / availability transition

4 → 2 provider executions
4 paid analyses → 2 paid analyses · avoided 2 paid analyses

Controlled authoritative A,A,B,B retail fixture. The changed price/availability fingerprint forced a new analysis before reuse resumed; this is not a live Apple price-change claim.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
75%

Inventory / availability downstream extraction

4 → 1 provider executions
4 Firecrawl credits → 1 Firecrawl credit · avoided 3 Firecrawl credits

Real Adafruit inventory state. Firecrawl provider-native maxAge also stayed at 4 calls / 4 credits; SeenRelay used the retailer Product API as a cheap opaque state token and performed one paid extraction. If that native API already answers the entire need, SeenRelay should not be used.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality NATIVE_FIRST_CONDITIONAL · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
51.58% mean

Inventory state transition

4 → 2 provider executions
4 paid analyses → 2 paid analyses · avoided 2 paid analyses

Controlled A,A,B,B stock/availability transition. Each changed state forced a new paid analysis before reuse resumed; gross modeled reduction ranged from 50% to 53.1%. This is not a live retailer stock-change claim.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
74.84%

AI gateway cold concurrent cache misses

4 → 1 provider executions
4 upstream executions → 1 upstream execution · avoided 3 upstream executions

Mechanism-only benchmark: against LiteLLM Proxy 1.103.2 + Redis exact cache, four cold concurrent misses caused four upstream executions and SeenRelay single-flight caused one. The exact benchmark output was a fixed constant, so this isolates the cold-concurrency gap rather than proving model-call necessity.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality MECHANISM_ONLY_LOCAL_WINS · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
79.61% mean

News / event downstream briefing

4 → 1 provider executions
4 paid briefings → 1 paid briefing · avoided $0.0546–$0.1010 modeled

Real Hacker News event authority plus real OpenAI web-search briefing. In 3/3 stable-state runs, four paid briefings became one and gross avoided cost was $0.05462206–$0.10098029 per group (70.95%–90.00%). HN remained the native state authority; independent customer prevalence is not claimed.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality TOOL_NECESSITY_PASS_BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
49.93% mean

News / event state transition

4 → 2 provider executions
4 paid briefings → 2 paid briefings · avoided $0.0116–$0.0664 modeled

Controlled A,A,B,B transition using two real current Hacker News events. The changed event forced a fresh briefing before reuse resumed; naturally observed rank transition is not claimed.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality TOOL_NECESSITY_PASS_BEST_BASELINE_UNPROVEN · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
75%

Shared generated image artifact

4 → 1 provider executions
≥$0.212 → ≥$0.053 · avoided ≥$0.159

Only valid when all callers explicitly accept one shared generated artifact and diversity is not required.

Controlled first-party benchmark · baseline quality CONTRACT_DEPENDENT · semantic PASS · repeatability 3/3

Integration path →
NEGATIVE EVIDENCE

We publish what did not earn a claim.

A lower bill is not enough if the result changes meaning.

NO PASS

Structured JSON extraction

Provider credits fell mechanically, but authoritative outputs disagreed on title/headline field semantics. SeenRelay does not count this as validated savings.

NO PASS

OCR / document extraction

One exact trial passed, but repeatability failed because independent OCR outputs varied semantically. OCR is not promoted.

ADOPTION

Match your expensive read path to a proven mechanism.

If your workload resembles a proven surface, install the narrowest supported integration and start in shadow. The proof atlas establishes that the mechanism can save provider work; your shadow run establishes whether the pattern actually occurs often enough in your workload.